Re:Former Tesla Firmware Engineer Discusses the System
by forapurpose on Saturday August 25, 2018 @12:41AM
(#17839577)
> What would SF look like if a superstructure was built above all streets and all pedestrian and bike traffic was moved up there?
The street level would be dark and storefronts would become difficult to access. If the stores moved up to the 2nd floor (a massive transformation of real estate, probably greatly reducing available living space), what would go on the first level? Not many people would want to live in the dark.
Re:Former Tesla Firmware Engineer Discusses the System
by samatman on Saturday August 25, 2018 @06:40AM
(#17840338)
It's not a pure hypothetical, large parts of contemporary Chicago were built up a level.
The results are mostly "garden apartments" which are damp, dim, and slightly less expensive.
Re:Former Tesla Firmware Engineer Discusses the System
by coatmatter on Friday August 24, 2018 @07:23PM
(#17838563)
Underground space isn't unlimited.
Besides, the best integrated transport solution in the world already exists in places like Utrecht, Groningen and Assen thanks to reforms that started decades ago.
Not just for cars, but also for cargo... just have a constant gondola-like conveyer that detaches a platform from the line to slow it enough to allow for cargo to get on, then re-zip-it backinto the line and speed it along, de-rail it once it hits its exit/location...
ideally though, in cities, there would be no surface streets and all cars would have their own level below that of bikes pedestrians.
What would SF look like if a superstructure was built above all streets and all pedestrian and bike traffic was moved up there? (sure, SF may be a poor example, so just select [city])
Look at Singapore's vast underground connecting malls between facilities. Those are pretty amazing.
I grade US urban/city planners rather poorly.