Re:Designing Solo, a new U2F/FIDO2 Token
by jiveturkey on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @05:38PM
(#17863134)
> to obtain stronger hardware we'd need to sign NDAs with vendors, and thus we couldn't make our key open source.
That's not true. First, you won't even be eligible to sign an NDA with a secure chip vendor. Second, this won't limit you from having your application (running on their chip) subject to the NDA.
To protect from physical attacks you need stronger devices, for example Yubico now has an entire new line of FIPS certified products. Note that the cost is higher than the FIDO2 usb-a only key.
As Conor mentioned in other places, to obtain stronger hardware we'd need to sign NDAs with vendors, and thus we couldn't make our key open source. Personally, I really hope that this first iteration will be a success, so we'll be able to push the industry for even more open hardware, and eventually we'll be able to address threats like the one you reported.