News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Unlikely Return of Birkenstock by Marsymars on Friday August 24, 2018 @02:42AM (#17833210)
I don't see why well-designed shoes shouldn't last for years. My most-worn pair currently is a set of VivoBarefoots that I've conservatively worn for something in the range of a thousand days, during which I've walked pretty extensively. Replaced the insoles with some spares I had when the originals started to disintegrate. I expect I'll wear through the sole (originally 4mm) within the next year or so.

I have some Adidas turf shoes with probably upwards of three thousand soccer/ultimate games played in them that are still going. (Though one of the studs is threatening to rip off, so I've got a newer pair that I wear for out-of-town games and that I keep in my car as backup.)

When failure methods are fabric tearing, glue or stitches coming apart, excess localized wear, etc. I blame poor design.

Re:The Unlikely Return of Birkenstock by taeric on Friday August 24, 2018 @03:06AM (#17833291)
I have yet to have a pair of shoes that can take continuous wear from me for more than a couple of seasons. Yes, I can get a ton more wear from shoes if I do not wear them every single hour of every day. However, I don't care to deal with the storage to rotate what shoe I wear day to day.

That said, now that I bike every day to work, my biking shoes get worn pretty much every morning and last for some obvious reasons. This leaves my day to day shoe much less stress than what they used to get, such that my crappy shoes that I only wear in the office have lasted a few seasons at this point.

But I have come to view the idea of a shoe that can last years as a myth that just isn't worth chasing. Back when I walked upwards of 5 miles a day at a minimum, I was happy to get 2 season's wear of my shoes. And that was splurging for some rather expensive shoes.