Re:Disable SMT/Hyperthreading in all Intel BIOSes
by abcdef123xyz123 on Thursday August 23, 2018 @05:09PM
(#17830727)
OpenBSD has never disobeyed an embargo. Argued for them to be reduced, criticized them, but not disobeyed them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Disable SMT/Hyperthreading in all Intel BIOSes
by DannyBee on Friday August 24, 2018 @01:10AM
(#17832920)
i'm pretty sure this is not true:
The most recent example i remember is:
https://lobste.rs/s/dwzplh/krack_attacks_breaking_wpa2#c_pbh...
Re:Disable SMT/Hyperthreading in all Intel BIOSes
by capt8bit on Friday August 24, 2018 @01:39AM
(#17833023)
This is common misinformation. Even in this case, OpenBSD did not break the embargo. After protesting, they received the permission of the researcher to publish:
Note that I wrote and included a suggested diff for OpenBSD already, and that
at the time the tentative disclosure deadline was around the end of August. As
a compromise, I allowed them to silently patch the vulnerability.
(https://www.krackattacks.com/#openbsd)