Re:Magic Leap One Teardown
by DmenshunlAnlsis on Thursday August 23, 2018 @02:17PM
(#17829466)
The wired to your goggles belt mounted computer strikes me as a hazard and source of potential discomfort, and is noticeably absent from its nearest competitor. Those cables aren’t break-away, so with your view of the real world dimmed by 80%+ and your FOV narrowed life could get pretty interesting.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Magic Leap One Teardown
by erikpukinskis on Thursday August 23, 2018 @02:25PM
(#17829527)
OK, I have to go Google its nearest competitor now, to try to understand your point of comparison...
Edit: I think you're talking about Hololens, which does put all of the batteries on your head. Yes, I think you've correctly identified another company taking a different approach. And you've correctly identified the usability trafeoff associated with the belt-mounted battery. I maintain that the tradeoffs are such that we will see many companies using non-head-mounted batteries in order to support longer use sessions.
Hololens is notably not good enough, graphically. Neither is Magic Leap. I don't contest that you can do a not-good-enough head mounted computer
Re:Magic Leap One Teardown
by VectorLock on Thursday August 23, 2018 @04:30PM
(#17830446)
Wired to a belt mounted computer doesn't sound dangerous. Wired to a fixed computer sitting near by, that sounds dangerous.