News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:385 Feet of Crazy: The Most Audacious Flying Machine by dexen on Thursday August 23, 2018 @12:01PM (#17828346)
Air launch (to orbit)[1] has been a thing for a good while now. As others have stated, fuel savings are enormous; jet engines have orders of magnitude higher efficiency than rocket engines when taking fuel tankage into account. Air resistance is barely an issue, and same for the gravity drag. But most importantly, launch mass is greatly reduced in part thanks to not having to carry oxidizer for the first stage. Another factor, rocket's first stage must have powerful, thus heavy, engines with enough thrust to both counter gravity and impair acceleration; an orbital insertion stage can do with much lower TWR, thus again mass savings for air launch.

Point in case, note the size of the Pegasus orbital rocket [2]. Or the orbital anti-satellite missile, sized like a typical cruise missile, all thanks to air launch [3] from a typical fighter jet.

Now that SpaceX is able to recover the first stages from some launches, the cost of first stage is a bit less of a factor, but still there are other considerations, like ability to launch from any decent runway vs having to maintain a dedicated facility, unusable for any other commercial purposes, far away from humans due to incredible amount of noise rocket engines create.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_launch_to_orbit

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pegasus_(rocket)

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT

Re:385 Feet of Crazy: The Most Audacious Flying Machine by greglindahl on Thursday August 23, 2018 @01:20PM (#17828979)
As you can tell from air launch not dominating the market, there are minuses to it, too. Pegasus has extra mass because it's got aerodynamic surfaces that traditional rockets don't need. And it takes a lot of gear at the remote airstrip to support the launch.

https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/06/08/airplane-with-pegasus-...