Re:Ask HN: What are the websites that you rely on but have h...
by mahmud on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @05:41AM
(#1782822)
Oh, I stand corrected then.
I discovered ArXiv over a decade ago, but from early on, it was filled with people of questionable insight, if not sanity, and I began to avoid it. There are some notorious USENET trolls who used it to build their credibility, and it kept me away since.
Re:Ask HN: What are the websites that you rely on but have h...
by nagrom on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @06:19AM
(#1782869)
It's got no data quality checks, so you need to use it with caution, but something like http://arxiv.org/list/hep-ex/recent is a really nice tool for High Energy Physics (you can see quite a few of the first results from the LHC there, for example, without paying any journal subs.)
But it's a much better academic tool than a commercial one, and I would not be surprised that a lot of cranks put stuff up there and claim respectability by association, especially in theory or mathematics.
Re:Ask HN: What are the websites that you rely on but have h...
by JoachimSchipper on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @08:48AM
(#1783125)
Actually, getting your paper into arXiv isn't that easy - IIRC, it essentially requires you to work at a university.
Re:Ask HN: What are the websites that you rely on but have h...
by nagrom on Tuesday October 12, 2010 @09:15AM
(#1783201)
I think that you must register as being present at an institution, but I am not sure how strongly they check that information. Maybe they take your subs off if you are caught lying, but what are the chances of being caught?
It's true that you need to be an expert in the field to tell the crackpots from the experts, but if you don't understand enough of the paper to tell whether it is realistic or not then you probably will not gain very much from reading it.