Re:Is Pop Music Evolving, or Is It Just Getting Louder? (2012)
by wiz21c on Wednesday August 22, 2018 @08:49AM
(#17818302)
maybe also because in the past you had to be a real musician to actually play something (no hardware to help you). So many were trained in making music (instead of self made) ? Not that being trained equals quality, but somehow, maybe it helps... (IANAMusician :) )
Re:Is Pop Music Evolving, or Is It Just Getting Louder? (2012)
by braythwayt on Wednesday August 22, 2018 @09:13AM
(#17818427)
Pop music of the past had plenty of people lip-syncing their concerts, house bands that played all the instruments, and so forth.
It is not obvious that you had to be a trained musician to succeed. Many who succeeded were, but many who succeeded are not.
There was a lot of crap in the charts, but I think the overall level of quality was higher. I think the reason for that higher quality was essentially negative - the routes to an audience were much narrower, so artists were practically required to get into the charts to sustain a professional career. A far broader range of artists were playing the major label game, because they didn't have many alternatives.
"Pop" is a much narrower term in 2018 than it was in 1978, because musicians don't need chart hits or radio airplay. Digital recording and distribution have created a much more fragmented music market, because artists can connect directly with audiences rather than relying on a very narrow funnel of publicity and distribution. Good music is somewhat more difficult to find today, but I think there's more of it and more definitions of "good".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_of_the_Pops
(proxy required outside the UK):
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/b00704hg