News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Hacker News ranking algorithm works by gojomo on Monday October 11, 2010 @07:35PM (#1781722)
I'd agree simple is better.

Of the two suggestions, replacing hours with artificial ticks adds very little complexity: it's the same formula, with one value replaced, and the accompanying factor adjusted. (The ticks might be submission-count, upvote-count, visit-count, or anything else trivially tallied -- it may not make much difference, except that over time greater activity could require adjusting the tick-deflator-factor.)

Re:How Hacker News ranking algorithm works by jshen on Monday October 11, 2010 @08:54PM (#1781882)
visit count is not trivial. A db write for every page view is heavy.
Re:How Hacker News ranking algorithm works by seabee on Monday October 11, 2010 @10:40PM (#1782099)
Persist it in memory, you only need periodical writes for something like that. We're not running on a $5 powweb account here.
Re:How Hacker News ranking algorithm works by jshen on Wednesday October 13, 2010 @11:56PM (#1789762)
Right, but then it's not trivial which was my point. It can. Be trivial and not scale, or scale and not be trivial.

I'm not sure why I get down voted for this.