Re:Small Assets without the Headache in Elm 0.19
by leshow on Thursday August 23, 2018 @09:24AM
(#17827023)
> What makes you say that?
Because Evan has shown no interest in implementing a feature like what I'm describing.
Re:Small Assets without the Headache in Elm 0.19
by Skinney on Sunday August 26, 2018 @06:43AM
(#17845274)
That's like saying Go will never get generics because it doesn't have it right now. Evan doesn't believe type classes are a right fit for Elm, but he has never to my knowledge ruled out that ad-hoc polymorphism will be added to the language.
What makes you say that? Elm has yet to reach 1.0, anything can happen. It's not likely it will happen any time soon, however.