News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Classic craigslist coding job ad Not to follow up. Parent comment

Re:Classic craigslist coding job ad Not to follow up by cnelsen on Sunday October 10, 2010 @05:28PM (#1778000)
Since I didn't ask to be publicly identified--let alone skewered--on Hackers.com, my manner of approach is irrelevant, in my view. I won't be so rude as to call your post "crap", but why don't you give an example of the "useful information" you say is missing from my ad that justifies you calling my ad "crap".

I haven't read any other thread on this site, but I assume "HN's approach to comments" is widely ignored?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Classic craigslist coding job ad Not to follow up by headShrinker on Monday October 11, 2010 @12:21AM (#1778800)
Cnelsen, the major problem with the listing is it lacks any detail about the project or how you expect to execute it. If you think a program is summed up by 4 bullets you have no understanding of what is involved, thus, you are in short 'the nightmare client'.
[ Parent | on HN ]