News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon Musk’s Funding for Tesla Wasn’t So Secure by RayVR on Tuesday August 14, 2018 @04:05PM (#17761412)
“Investor support is confirmed. Only reason why this is not certain is that it’s contingent on a shareholder vote.”

This certainly means that if you only need a shareholder vote then you have everything else in place. "Only reason" by definition means there is no other reason this couldn't be.

Re:Elon Musk’s Funding for Tesla Wasn’t So Secure by eduah on Tuesday August 14, 2018 @06:30PM (#17762480)
If I offer you money for a thing, you have a board you know agrees with a deal to sell, you do no anticipate any due diligence hiccups, isn't the only uncertainty about the sale the vote of you other co-owners of the thing I am trying to buy? Note he didn't say the only step, he said the only uncertain thing that could stop the deal are the share holders.
Re:Elon Musk’s Funding for Tesla Wasn’t So Secure by gamblor956 on Tuesday August 14, 2018 @06:45PM (#17762559)
No, he said it was the only reason. Therefore, due diligence, etc. couldn't be the reasons the deal didn't happen.
Re:Elon Musk’s Funding for Tesla Wasn’t So Secure by eduah on Tuesday August 14, 2018 @06:50PM (#17762585)
Yes, precisely what I am saying. That he has no reason, we can reasonably deduce from his statements, to think due diligence, etc might be the reason why the deal doesn't go through.

So again, just for clarity, he didn't say the only to be done is the vote, he said the only reason why he currently expects the deal might not happen is if rejected by share holders.