News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by spacehome on Monday August 13, 2018 @07:50PM (#17754516)
> chemical-free

Are they selling a vacuum? What could that phrase possibly mean with regards to baryonic matter?

Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by TheSpiceIsLife on Monday August 13, 2018 @08:22PM (#17754686)
You forgot the Golden Rule.

Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize.¹

1. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by spacehome on Monday August 13, 2018 @08:47PM (#17754795)
I'm really trying. Some things some people think are just nonsensical because their model of reality is too inaccurate.
Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by whatshisface on Monday August 13, 2018 @10:02PM (#17755064)
"Chemical-free" is an abbreviation of "dangerous chemical free," or in some cases (for car seats, not so much food), "chemically inert." Nobody would ever have a reason to specify that something should contain no chemicals at all, so the word "dangerous" is dropped in what is essentially an application of Huffman coding. ;)
Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by spacehome on Monday August 13, 2018 @11:21PM (#17755371)
I could be misinterpreting people, but I think there are people who haven't quite thought it through this much.
Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by TheSpiceIsLife on Tuesday August 14, 2018 @01:02AM (#17755689)
Yes, you.
Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by spacehome on Tuesday August 14, 2018 @02:16AM (#17755923)
Cute. I like you.
Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by checkyoursudo on Monday August 13, 2018 @11:07PM (#17755310)
Yes, this is what the endorsers were meaning, and what most people mean when saying it (general populace, marketers, etc).

Toxin-free. Poison-free. Dye-free. Fragrance-free.

This is the vernacular usage of "chemical free" in the US.

Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by TeMPOraL on Tuesday August 14, 2018 @01:30AM (#17755774)
> Toxin-free. Poison-free. Dye-free. Fragrance-free.

Artificial toxin/poison/dye/fragrance-free. You can shove as much naturally occurring toxins in the product as you like, and both marketers and regular people will agree it's "chemical-free".

And that's side-stepping the whole "artificial" vs. "natural" nonsense. 'spacehome may be pedantic in this context, but in general, he's right - regular people have their model of the world ridiculously out of sync with reality. Which is of course readily exploited by advertisers selling "chemical free", "natural", "organic" products, which are no better (and sometimes worse) than the "artificial" ones, but still command a premium price.

Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by cwkoss on Tuesday August 14, 2018 @03:13AM (#17756084)
The world would be a better place if someone called out "chemical free" as a bullshit phrase every time it was used.
Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by checkyoursudo on Monday August 13, 2018 @07:58PM (#17754567)
The types of mommy-bloggers and non-a-list celebs who would think dihydrogen monoxide is a caustic toxin. It's a certain type. You'll know them when you see/read them. ;)
Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by apatters on Monday August 13, 2018 @11:57PM (#17755497)
Well it actually is both of those things, if you sit in it long enough you'll melt, if you breathe it in you'll die, so maybe they're smarter than you think :)
Re:Endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in US: disease bur... by checkyoursudo on Monday August 13, 2018 @11:08PM (#17755313)
I am sorry. That was a dumb joke to try to make.