Re:US elections remain 'dangerously vulnerable' to cyber-att...
by nonbel on Monday August 13, 2018 @01:27PM
(#17751797)
>"Media is hyping the fear of 'election hacking' to the point where people I know personally want everything to be done manually, no machine or computer involvement at all."
Whats wrong with this?
Re:US elections remain 'dangerously vulnerable' to cyber-att...
by bluGill on Monday August 13, 2018 @02:25PM
(#17752360)
It takes time - we wouldn't know who was elected president until several days after the election was over.
I tried to write that in a neutral tone. However you might find it as amusing as me to read it (with required word changes) in different dialects. I think the stereotypical "valley girl" best captures how I feel about it.
Re:US elections remain 'dangerously vulnerable' to cyber-att...
by nonbel on Monday August 13, 2018 @02:50PM
(#17752570)
That doesn't seem like much of an issue to me when the alternative is nobody trusts the results.
Re:US elections remain 'dangerously vulnerable' to cyber-att...
by bluGill on Monday August 13, 2018 @03:03PM
(#17752674)
To you. But it is a big deal some someone else. Your task is to figure out who, and why. (why tends to be obvious once you realize who)
Media is hyping the fear of 'election hacking' to the point where people I know personally want everything to be done manually, no machine or computer involvement at all.