Deep learning to predict the lab-of-origin of engineered DNA

Re:Deep learning to predict the lab-of-origin of engineered DNA by curiousgal on Sunday August 12, 2018 @06:12PM (#17746716)

Tangent: I wish papers that get published contained a section with the reviewers' notes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Deep learning to predict the lab-of-origin of engineered DNA by sampo on Sunday August 12, 2018 @06:17PM (#17746750)

> I wish papers that get published contained a section with the reviewers' notes.

At least the journals published by the European Geosciences Union publish the whole review process in the open. Reviewers' comments, and authors' responses to them.

https://www.egu.eu/publications/open-access-journals/

(When you open the view to any article in any of those journals, you need to click on the "Peer review" tab, and you get to see the original manuscript as "Discussion paper", and all of the review process.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Deep learning to predict the lab-of-origin of engineered DNA by twic on Sunday August 12, 2018 @06:41PM (#17746869)

Current Anthropology does this - see the 'comments' starting on page 407 of this paper, for example:

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/698936

I have no idea if this is standard in anthropology. I am not an anthropologist, nor do i play one on television.

[ Parent | on HN ]