News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Public DNS turns 8.8.8.8 years old by mrmondo on Saturday August 11, 2018 @08:18PM (#17742257)
I’m almost certain it is, even in the link you posted they use unversed language to state they DO store not just your information but also your personally identifiable (!) information:

> “Google Public DNS does not PERMANENTLY store personally identifiable information.”

You have to be very, very careful with services like this especially when it comes to Google, Facebook and Microsoft (and the companies they own), they use weasel wording in documents like this almost all the time and it’s clearly with intent to /seem/ as if they’re good citizens rather than to _prove_ that they are.

Re:Google Public DNS turns 8.8.8.8 years old by mehrdadn on Saturday August 11, 2018 @08:43PM (#17742319)
Yes, they do not PERMANENTLY store PII, because they are crystal clear about the fact that they store it temporarily, and that by that they explicitly say they mean 24-48 hours:

> Google Public DNS stores two sets of logs: temporary and permanent.

> The temporary logs store the full IP address of the machine you're using.

> We delete these temporary logs within 24 to 48 hours.

> In the permanent logs, we don't keep personally identifiable information or IP information.

"Permanently" is not weasel-worded here.

Re:Google Public DNS turns 8.8.8.8 years old by Symbiote on Saturday August 11, 2018 @09:09PM (#17742398)
So they do permanently store some information, perhaps tied to everything that isn't PII: my location, connection speed, time of day, access frequency. That can certainly be used to target adverts.

When an easy alternative is a company that doesn't have a reason to store this data, why not choose them?

Re:Google Public DNS turns 8.8.8.8 years old by mehrdadn on Saturday August 11, 2018 @09:24PM (#17742469)
By all means, choose whomever you trust the most. All I was saying in my response above was that, in making that decision, it would probably make sense to make sure you're reading their privacy policies accurately first. In this case the idea that "permanently" was weasel-worded seemed incorrect and misleading to me.