Re:Monsanto ordered to pay $289M damages in Roundup cancer t...
by ScottBurson on Saturday August 11, 2018 @12:39PM
(#17740364)
I can't speak to what was in the jurors' minds, but in my opinion that's backwards: it is concern about glyphosate that is primarily driving fear of GMOs. If we got rid of glyphosate, I for one would not have any problem with the other GMOs I am currently aware of, though I would of course reserve the option of objecting to specific GMOs I might learn about in the future.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Monsanto ordered to pay $289M damages in Roundup cancer t...
by shawnz on Saturday August 11, 2018 @11:32PM
(#17742748)
> it is concern about glyphosate that is primarily driving fear of GMOs.
In my experience the two most common anti-GMO arguments that I hear are: A) that GMOs can be patented, which creates IP problems when they spread, and B) that somehow human-designed species might be less safe than natural ones due to unintended health consequences of the modifications (not really sure the rationale for that one.)
Re:Monsanto ordered to pay $289M damages in Roundup cancer t...
by saalweachter on Sunday August 12, 2018 @10:30AM
(#17744493)
How do you feel about bt crops?
Re:Monsanto ordered to pay $289M damages in Roundup cancer t...
by DmenshunlAnlsis on Saturday August 11, 2018 @01:47PM
(#17740703)
It’s important to point out that this case is about Roundup as a whole product, of which less than half is glyphosate, not just glyphosate. Some other posts here go over this in more detail.