Re:1/0 = 0
by pmiller2 on Friday August 10, 2018 @04:29PM
(#17736509)
You’re doing something different than real number arithmetic. Saying 1/0 = x, and then treating x like a real number is inconsistent. But just saying “we are going to augment the real numbers with an element x that is not a real number, and then define some properties of x and prove things about it” is not.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:1/0 = 0
by FlipperBucket on Friday August 10, 2018 @04:51PM
(#17736640)
> You’re doing something different than real number arithmetic
Computer languages execute on rules that are not utilizing real number arithmetic. I didn't want to mention it, but there's these things called floats...
Edit: Pony took out the "normal" version of division by zero and suggest to write a wrapper to check beforehand.
Where did I say anything about computers? I’m referring to real numbers.
Re:1/0 = 0
by FlipperBucket on Friday August 10, 2018 @05:13PM
(#17736785)
The topic is a computer language. I'm referring to utility.
Floating point is only useful to the extent that it approximates real arithmetic.