Re:Show HN: A decentralized index of banned users and where ...
by Mizza on Friday August 10, 2018 @09:52AM
(#17733219)
I can't believe this needs to be stated, but the objection that normal people have to censorship is that we don't want a small handful of corporations and celebrity bullies to be the ones who get to decide what is or isn't "legitimate voice", as you put it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: A decentralized index of banned users and where ...
by codingdave on Friday August 10, 2018 @09:56AM
(#17733249)
"normal people"?
This is a discussion that has some serious points on both sides. I don't believe throwing judgments on the people who choose a side that differs from your own will be helpful.
Re:Show HN: A decentralized index of banned users and where ...
by wu-ikkyu on Friday August 10, 2018 @09:58AM
(#17733267)
I think they meant "normal people" as in not a corporation or a celebrity
Re:Show HN: A decentralized index of banned users and where ...
by close04 on Friday August 10, 2018 @10:23AM
(#17733476)
I tend to use regular people just to avoid this confusion :).
Re:Show HN: A decentralized index of banned users and where ...
by DoofusOfDeath on Friday August 10, 2018 @10:36AM
(#17733590)
IIUC, in U.S. jurisprudence the term "natural person" serves that role.
Re:Show HN: A decentralized index of banned users and where ...
by close04 on Friday August 10, 2018 @10:56AM
(#17733785)
This is slightly different. It's to differentiate between individual entity and legal entity.
But normal/regular person can be used as opposed to celebrity, or billionaire. Both Jeff Bezos and myself are natural persons. Only one is a normal/regular person :).