News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I don't trust Signal by dleslie on Thursday August 09, 2018 @11:16AM (#17724880)
Last time I had it installed it scanned my contacts a half dozen times while I slept. I removed it in the AM.
Re:I don't trust Signal by jlund on Thursday August 09, 2018 @12:26PM (#17725621)
The Contacts permission is completely optional, and contact information is never stored: https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/
Re:I don't trust Signal by ppjet6 on Thursday August 09, 2018 @01:02PM (#17726029)
This seems like smoke and mirrors to me:

  Traditionally, in Signal that process has looked like:
  
    The client calculates the truncated SHA256 hash of each phone number in the device’s address book.
    The client transmits those truncated hashes to the service.
    The service does a lookup from a set of hashed registered users.
    The service returns the intersection of registered users.
The phone number space is really not this big.
Re:I don't trust Signal by detaro on Thursday August 09, 2018 @01:06PM (#17726069)
They acknowledge that in literally the next paragraph, and the entire post is about how they improved on that old state of things. How is that "smoke and mirrors"?
Re:I don't trust Signal by ppjet6 on Thursday August 09, 2018 @01:37PM (#17726451)
Right, my bad. This does look like a sensible solution
Re:I don't trust Signal by Boulth on Thursday August 09, 2018 @02:38PM (#17727120)
Is this solution deployed in production? The source code says "beta".
Re:I don't trust Signal by balladeer on Thursday August 09, 2018 @11:29AM (#17725009)
To be fair it does that to map you with the contacts who also are on Signal just like WhatsApp or Telegram does. Though you could also use Telegram just with user_names w/o phonebook permission but for signing up you need to use your actual phone number.