Re:Julia 1.0
by fpoling on Thursday August 09, 2018 @10:10AM
(#17724311)
numpy wiki summaries that well [1]. Too many things especially with complex math cannot run in parallel unless one spends a lot of time on workarounds.
One starts with quick and dirty solution, makes it work on a small dataset and then struggle to make it utilize at least 4 cores to cut running time with more realist datasets. Surelly I can code numerical calculations in C++, but then the code cannot be maintained by python-only guy. So I hope that Julia or anything else with better parallel support replaces Python for scientific calculations when scaling quick and dirty solutions is straightforward.
One starts with quick and dirty solution, makes it work on a small dataset and then struggle to make it utilize at least 4 cores to cut running time with more realist datasets. Surelly I can code numerical calculations in C++, but then the code cannot be maintained by python-only guy. So I hope that Julia or anything else with better parallel support replaces Python for scientific calculations when scaling quick and dirty solutions is straightforward.
[1] http://scipy-cookbook.readthedocs.io/items/ParallelProgrammi...