News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Shannon Labs – $100K Fellowship to support independent re... by AndrewKemendo on Wednesday August 08, 2018 @09:05PM (#17720983)
The fact that Joscha Bach is involved gives this more credibility than anything else.

I'm tempted to apply but I'm guessing the work I want to do is too far afield of traditional ML work, maybe someone can tell me if that's wrong.

The work I want to do is not in iterations on algos, like I've been working on with CV problems, but better defining intelligence and building testing mechanisms for it along the lines of the work of the Anytime Intelligence Test [1].

Too little is being done on baselining real world intelligence and so what we get are closed world, fully observable tests, which are impressive, but aren't really functionally useful when we're trying to build or test AI's generalization capabilities.

Re:Shannon Labs – $100K Fellowship to support independent re... by protonfish on Thursday August 09, 2018 @10:20AM (#17724405)
It seems reasonable that before we work on AI, we rigorously define what the "I" actually means. But maybe that's just us?
Re:Shannon Labs – $100K Fellowship to support independent re... by AndrewKemendo on Thursday August 09, 2018 @04:50PM (#17728367)
Yea, crazy idea isn't it?
Re:Shannon Labs – $100K Fellowship to support independent re... by suprathreshold on Wednesday August 08, 2018 @09:50PM (#17721145)
Re: credibility---as for my realm the same can be said about Blake Richards.