Re:Practical Common Lisp (2009)
by didibus on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @01:41PM
(#17708751)
I'm referring to the fact that Common Lisp does not have a map and set literal by default. It has a lot of homoiconic literals, and is still very homoiconic. And Common Lisp's reader and printer can be extended by the user to add them back in non standard ways. I still personally consider it as a slight cons against Clojure.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.