Re:WireGuard: Next Generation Kernel Network Tunnel [pdf]
by zx2c4 on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @02:55AM
(#17704355)
> If the authors had the intent
Fortunately I know exactly what I was thinking. Each message has an explicit type. The set of types exists in the first byte with the remaining three reserved for future additional use, perhaps for naming types. The cryptography is tied to the version by way the identifier and construction constants.
Fortunately I know exactly what I was thinking. Each message has an explicit type. The set of types exists in the first byte with the remaining three reserved for future additional use, perhaps for naming types. The cryptography is tied to the version by way the identifier and construction constants.