News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Numba and Cython are not substitutes for Julia.

Re:Why Numba and Cython are not substitutes for Julia by oxinabox on Monday August 06, 2018 @11:24AM (#17698399)
Anyone got any good examples major program written using Numba? Plenty exist for Cython -- I run into those all the time.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Numba and Cython are not substitutes for Julia by IlyaOrson on Monday August 06, 2018 @08:29PM (#17702956)
Not sure if a major program but here is a recent and promising one: https://github.com/lmcinnes/umap
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Numba and Cython are not substitutes for Julia by tavert on Monday August 06, 2018 @05:30PM (#17701950)
fastparquet https://github.com/dask/fastparquet
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Numba and Cython are not substitutes for Julia by pkofod on Monday August 06, 2018 @04:19PM (#17701401)
Do you mean top-to-bottom Numba-jitted? Or projects/libraries that use Numba to speed up parts of the code?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Numba and Cython are not substitutes for Julia by ivirshup on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @12:38AM (#17703903)
Datashader (http://datashader.org)
[ Parent | on HN ]