News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tech Billionaires Hack Their Taxes with a Philanthropic L... by ChristianBundy on Sunday August 05, 2018 @04:09PM (#17693241)
1. You're conflating owners and managers. Private ownership of the means of production doesn't add anything of value, but of course organizing people and resources is valuable. My point is that you don't need to have a monoply (or oligopoly) of power concentrated in private shareholders.

2. I'm not interested in myths. Look up statistics on immigrant poverty under capitalism and let me know whether you'd like to continue this line of reasoning.

3. Some, yes. All? Of course not.

Re:Tech Billionaires Hack Their Taxes with a Philanthropic L... by WalterBright on Sunday August 05, 2018 @06:22PM (#17693896)
> Private ownership of the means of production doesn't add anything of value

It absolutely does, because it decides where to allocate scarce resources.

Re:Tech Billionaires Hack Their Taxes with a Philanthropic L... by ghufran_syed on Sunday August 05, 2018 @04:21PM (#17693326)
About point 2: Almost all wealth in this country is owned by people who do not identify as Native American. The US is the most successful society economically over a long period of time. The US has a capitalist system, probably more so than most other countries. Doesn’t that imply that the wealth in this country was generated by immigrants (and their descendants) under a capitalist system?
Re:Tech Billionaires Hack Their Taxes with a Philanthropic L... by WalterBright on Sunday August 05, 2018 @04:39PM (#17693412)
Where do you think the vast wealth in the American middle class came from? It wasn't picked off the ground, it wasn't here in 1800, and the immigrants did not arrive with it.
Re:Tech Billionaires Hack Their Taxes with a Philanthropic L... by WalterBright on Sunday August 05, 2018 @06:20PM (#17693884)
> All? Of course not.

I can't think of any. Do you have any examples?