One Year Without AMP

Re:One Year Without AMP by amgin3 on Saturday August 04, 2018 @09:00AM (#17686701)

AMP is terrible and it is ruining the web for desktop users. I frequently get linked to AMP pages while on my desktop, and have never come across one that provides a link to the non-AMP version of the page and often the URL to the non-AMP version cannot be derived from the AMP URL.

What's wrong with using CSS media queries to have a responsive design? Or if you absolutely need a separate mobile site for some reason, at least give a link back to the full desktop version of the page..

I get that AMP is supposed to help optimize page loading for mobile devices, but for most sites I don't think it is necessary to go to the extremes of AMP in 2018. Most places in the world have decent enough internet speeds and mobile data allowances that pages do not need to be super tiny all the time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:One Year Without AMP by jwilk on Saturday August 04, 2018 @10:08AM (#17686895)

An AMP document is required to contain:

  <link rel="canonical" href="...">

pointing to the regular HTML document.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:One Year Without AMP by amgin3 on Saturday August 04, 2018 @11:02AM (#17687094)

Except that doesn't put a physical link in the document. Why should I have to dig into the source code of the page just to find the link to the normal page?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:One Year Without AMP by jwilk on Saturday August 04, 2018 @06:13PM (#17688664)

Some non-mainstream browsers (ELinks at least) make <link>s visible. This is occasionally useful, but most of the time it just wastes space. :-/

You might want to use this web extension to make automatic AMP → HTML redirects:

https://github.com/da2x/amp2html

Or you could use this bookmarklet:

  javascript:window.location=document.head.querySelector('link[rel="canonical"]').href

[ Parent | on HN ]