News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trash piles up in US as China closes door to recycling by sonnyblarney on Friday August 03, 2018 @02:27PM (#17682290)
Paper only doesn't make sense to recycle if you externalize a lot of the costs.

For example, what if we had to pay to put something in the garbage ... as we ultimately pay China?

Then the equilibrium in the equation changes ...

Re:Trash piles up in US as China closes door to recycling by slavik81 on Friday August 03, 2018 @03:59PM (#17683120)
I find it hard to believe the parent was failing to account for the cost of the landfill. It's the most obvious cost of that strategy, so it would be hard to miss.

On a related topic, to know that the equilibrium changes, you'd need to know the difference in cost before and after accounting for the thing you added.

This discussion would benefit significantly from careful analysis using actual numbers. If there's one thing that Bullshit! got right, it's that there are clear, empirical metrics we can use to evaluate solutions, and we should use them.

Re:Trash piles up in US as China closes door to recycling by lacker on Friday August 03, 2018 @04:01PM (#17683142)
I don't know where you live, but here in California I do pay for garbage services.