News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:HP Ink Printers Remote Code Execution by jaclaz on Friday August 03, 2018 @02:17PM (#17682175)
There is IMHO some form of "disconnection" between using "certain":

>Two security vulnerabilities have been identified with certain HP Inkjet printers.

and then list more than 200 (two hundred) printer models.

Re:HP Ink Printers Remote Code Execution by readyp1 on Friday August 03, 2018 @03:16PM (#17682768)
Maybe so, but "certain", from a grammatical standpoint, implies that they know exactly which models are affected, which in turn implies that it is not the entirety of their printers that are affected. Maybe that's not the case, and every single printer they make is affected, but that's just my thought on it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re:HP Ink Printers Remote Code Execution by jaclaz on Friday August 03, 2018 @03:34PM (#17682904)
I don't know, by reading "certain HP Inkjet printers" I imagined that it would imply a small number of "known" affected models (all belonging to the Inkjet family, of course).

It seems to me that the given list could be better summed up with something like:

"All HP Inkjet printers manufactured in the last n years, with the exception of models A, B and C"."

Re:HP Ink Printers Remote Code Execution by NullPrefix on Friday August 03, 2018 @04:00PM (#17683126)
>entirety of their printers that are affected

Some were too old for this vulnerability?

Re:HP Ink Printers Remote Code Execution by psetq on Friday August 03, 2018 @03:20PM (#17682801)
To be fair, that list doesn't seem to include any of their LaserJet range, which I've always thought was their "business class" printers...
Re:HP Ink Printers Remote Code Execution by theevilsharpie on Friday August 03, 2018 @03:41PM (#17682966)
Laserjets wouldn't be in the set of "certain HP Inkjet printers" because they are Laserjets, not Inkjets. :P