News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:One Year Without AMP by joegahona on Friday August 03, 2018 @10:55AM (#17680363)
The site I work on had a slight bump up the first month after disabling AMP, and we've had pretty flat traffic from SEO ever since, which feeds the conspiracy theorists that "AMP helps your search positioning."
Re:One Year Without AMP by partiallypro on Saturday August 04, 2018 @08:13AM (#17686546)
It's not a conspiracy theory, I've worked with Google engineers over the phone and email for an agency...and this is one of their pitches. They now will even help you build the AMP pages, or just build them for you.
Re:One Year Without AMP by joegahona on Saturday August 04, 2018 @05:02PM (#17688412)
I was on a Hangout with two product managers of AMP, and they told me exactly the opposite. This was Oct 2017. The exception is the news carousel, which appears at the top of search results and also contains only AMP. As of right now, however, it's only news content, and I don't work for a news site.
Re:One Year Without AMP by partiallypro on Sunday August 05, 2018 @11:20AM (#17691731)
My last call was a month ago, this was for a general home page of a site. If what they told me is not true, or what they told you is not true...Google needs to get their employees on the same page. But it appears from some of our experiences that it has helped rankings, which I find annoying and a bit baffling.
Re:One Year Without AMP by dannyw on Saturday August 04, 2018 @09:16AM (#17686753)
Yeah. We had a google employee tell us to build AMP to rank higher.
Re:One Year Without AMP by endorphone on Saturday August 04, 2018 @08:29AM (#17686599)
How does traffic staying flat after disabling AMP feed a conspiracy theory? That seems like a counterpoint.

And to the various other comments, Google's position that they are very open about is that users become accustomed to AMP sites being so fast that they start to favor them, so the click through rates should rise with AMP. If true, that seems entirely fair.

AMP is fascinating to me because it's something we can't discuss with any honesty at all. Instead it's over the top rhetoric where people with their outrageously abusive and unwelcoming sites complain that AMP is unnecessary because they could, like, make their site less abusive if they wanted. Any notion that AMP doesn't solve a real problem is just a non-starter derived from fantasy.