Ruby: Almost everything is an expression unlike Python, has symbols unlike Python, closures and anonymous functions are not crippled or second-class unlike Python, has full continuations unlike Python.

Lua: Simple, minimal syntax which is consistent (unlike Python), multiparadigm, designed around one core datastructure, metatables/metamethods, metaprogramming is encouraged, has environments.

If by lispy you mean data oriented code with functions instead of classes and composition, I'd argue that it's not only pythonic, but import this compliant.

there's also "hy", which gives you lisp syntax and access to the python libraries.

https://github.com/hylang/hy

I got the impression that Hy is stagnating. They removed 'let' in the recent releases (it's hard to imagine Lisp without 'let'). Also there is no support for async, which is pretty important for modern Python IMO.

Oh my, they removed 'cons' :(

    hy 0.11.1 using CPython(default) 3.5.3 on Linux
    => (cons 1 '(2 3))
    (1 2 3)


    hy 0.15.0 using CPython(default) 2.7.13 on Linux
    => (cons 1 '(2 3))
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/hy/importer.py", line 199, in hy_eval
        return eval(ast_compile(expr, "<eval>", "eval"), namespace)
      File "<eval>", line 1, in <module>
    NameError: name 'cons' is not defined