News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GUIs Considered Harmful (1992) by kiki_jiki on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @04:30AM (#17660566)
What's up with this "considered harmful" being used everywhere lately?
Re:GUIs Considered Harmful (1992) by saagarjha on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @04:32AM (#17660573)
It's based on "Go To Statement Considered Harmful", by Edsger Dijkstra: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Considered_harmful
Re:GUIs Considered Harmful (1992) by davymac on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @04:40AM (#17660622)
Yeah, I swear this is being posted so often it’s becoming something I’m starting to ignore (kind of becoming the boy who cried wolf)

It feels like the more recent versions of these articles are more poorly written. This article, however, was much more reasonable.

Re:GUIs Considered Harmful (1992) by molf on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @04:31AM (#17660570)
You disprove your own point, this is from 1992
Re:GUIs Considered Harmful (1992) by nailer on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @04:33AM (#17660579)
It's still had a comeback recently

And yes it's 80s/90s newsgroup flamebait. The author concedes GUIs are useful, they just want access to APIs.

Re:GUIs Considered Harmful (1992) by kiki_jiki on Wednesday August 01, 2018 @04:33AM (#17660578)
I mean, I see it a lot on hackernews.