News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on That $35 that scientific journals charge goes 100% to publisher, 0% to authors. Parent comment

Re:That $35 that scientific journals charge goes 100% to pub... by hyeonwho4 on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @09:00PM (#17658771)
What is the "added value" the society brings? If there was enough value add for researchers, then it could be incorporated into the membership fees. Conferences can be funded by commercial booths or higher attendance fees (most academic attendees are already paid for by grants); student conference scholarships can be paid for by a trust estabilshed by and promoted to senior scientists. The only other added value I can think of is political lobbying.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:That $35 that scientific journals charge goes 100% to pub... by Gauc2 on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @09:16PM (#17658863)
The society is a network of researchers with like interests. Political lobbying is also important for a lot of academic societies (like APS).

I find it interesting that you are advocating the removal of a current capitalistic/greedy funding model and replacing it with...another capitalistic/advertising model.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:That $35 that scientific journals charge goes 100% to pub... by windows_tips on Tuesday July 31, 2018 @09:48PM (#17658988)
That post doesn't advocate for a new model; it just points out possible deficiencies in current conceptions.

>The society is a network of researchers with like interests.

So, the added value is for the researchers in the network, but that value is subsidized by the "payers", who are not the researchers?

>Open access publishing threatens this subscription model. If paid library subscriptions disappear entirely, a new payer or payers will need to be found.

[ Parent | on HN ]