News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sex Scandal Toppled a Silicon Valley Chief. Investors Say... by cycrutchfield on Saturday July 28, 2018 @05:07PM (#17635058)
Ever heard of the word nepotism? This is not exactly groundbreaking stuff.
Re:Sex Scandal Toppled a Silicon Valley Chief. Investors Say... by kolbe on Saturday July 28, 2018 @05:30PM (#17635169)
Thanks for the unnecessary remedial English lesson. You could try answering the question instead of acting like that, though. Hiring a qualified friend to work under you isn't 'corrosive to an organization'. So why is managing a qualified romantic partner so objectionable?
Re:Sex Scandal Toppled a Silicon Valley Chief. Investors Say... by cycrutchfield on Saturday July 28, 2018 @05:36PM (#17635196)
If your boss hires their frat bro from college as one of your peers, and said frat bro starts getting promoted faster to you, would you consider that to create corrosive sentiments? Whether said frat bro is qualified or not, you may start to question your boss’s objectivity.
Re:Sex Scandal Toppled a Silicon Valley Chief. Investors Say... by kolbe on Saturday July 28, 2018 @05:58PM (#17635275)
I guess you kind of answered my question. You think that there should be zero personal relationships (you seem to be hung up on a frat one, but I'll extrapolate to friendships) between a boss and anyone under their chain of command? Good luck having success building a company where those people aren't allowed to be friends. Mandated personal indifference sounds more corrosive than your scenario.
Re:Sex Scandal Toppled a Silicon Valley Chief. Investors Say... by cycrutchfield on Saturday July 28, 2018 @06:24PM (#17635381)
No, I am just saying that care should be taken to reduce the appearance of impropriety when personal relationships are involved at work. The severity of the risk scales with the nature of the personal relationship (friend, lover, family). You seem to be trying to get me to say that this is a binary all-or-nothing thing, which is absurd.