Re:Evidence Shows Hackers Changed Votes in the 2016 Election...
by makomk on Saturday July 28, 2018 @05:15AM
(#17632347)
Well, the article got pulled, so I guess it was a pretty solid warning sign after all:
"Editor’s Note: This story was an opinion piece asserting there was evidence that hackers changed votes in the 2016 election. However, a number of statements in the piece are disputed by experts. As a result, we have pulled it down for editorial review, and will update it once that review is completed."
Re:Evidence Shows Hackers Changed Votes in the 2016 Election...
by pohl on Sunday July 29, 2018 @12:10PM
(#17638800)
The editors are operating a full three levels higher (than “responding to tone”) in the hierarchy of disagreement. They’re setting a good example. (Although a bit later than ideal.)
"Editor’s Note: This story was an opinion piece asserting there was evidence that hackers changed votes in the 2016 election. However, a number of statements in the piece are disputed by experts. As a result, we have pulled it down for editorial review, and will update it once that review is completed."