News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on So, that was a bummer. Parent comment

Re:So, that was a bummer by houseabsolute on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @06:38PM (#1761855)
http://labs.google.com/papers/bigtable.html
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:So, that was a bummer by staunch on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @08:26PM (#1762196)
That looks potentially useful in some cases. Can you send me the code/docs for that?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:So, that was a bummer by ddlatham on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @09:54PM (#1762404)
http://hbase.apache.org/
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:So, that was a bummer by ifesdjeen on Wednesday October 06, 2010 @03:33AM (#1763083)
Does it work that well for production for you? Really, that's extremely interesting.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:So, that was a bummer by rb2k_ on Wednesday October 06, 2010 @02:07AM (#1762915)
Also look at dynamo based systems like cassandra and riak (riak seems to have a better load balancing at the moment, cassandra is a bit more "bumpy")
[ Parent | on HN ]