Re:We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake ...
by douglaswlance on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @07:32AM
(#17600023)
Decentralized reputation system that uses Proof of Stake to validate the "truthiness" of an individual. Users validate an idea/content by sharing some of their reputation to lend credibility to another.
Re:We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake ...
by citrablue on Friday July 27, 2018 @11:48PM
(#17631408)
Isn't think what PageRank is? I have a website; by linking to you, I am vouching in a public space that I believe in your truthiness?
Re:We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake ...
by douglaswlance on Friday August 03, 2018 @12:03PM
(#17680954)
Pages are not specific enough. We need RationalArgumentRank.
Re:We’re underestimating the mind-warping potential of fake ...
by elialbert on Wednesday July 25, 2018 @10:07AM
(#17609305)
this assumes a basic level of intelligence that I really doubt we as a species possess. Don't you think the majority of red or blue tribe e-warriors would happily stake any amount of reputation on something they agree with, regardless of authenticity?
Second, it would only help to validate that a video was taken (and possibly that it was not modified? But I suspect a great deal of video footage gets modified after capture, for light balancing and whatnot.)
Beyond that, however, the problem is larger: videos can be started after a person incites another. They can selectively film parts of an incident, so you miss details off-camera. They miss context, can push an agenda -- all of which are (IMO) the bigger problems than validating a video provenance. (Also, the latter would require skepticism of all non-blockchain'd videos -- something that would take a major cultural shift.)