News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on Linux. Parent comment

Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by jtchang on Monday July 23, 2018 @10:33AM (#17593022)
Keep in mind that Google IMAP could mean Google Apps compatibility. And a good number of orgs use Google Apps.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by brightball on Monday July 23, 2018 @10:36AM (#17593041)
Oh I know, there's just so many existing IMAP clients that I can't imagine paying for a desktop email/calendar client to work with Google Apps. Not to mention all the web based bits like Google Inbox, etc.

The value proposition just isn't there with all of the free options already out there.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by drb91 on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @11:14AM (#17601735)
....not on linux there aren’t.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by __sr__ on Monday July 23, 2018 @11:51AM (#17593566)
Doesn’t Google Apps support MS Exchange on the server? The paid one, that is? I remember there was a lot of hue and cry over Google dropping MS Exchange option for free Gmail around the same time when Windows Phone 8 launched. But at the same time, Google said they would continue to offer Exchange for paid accounts. Has that changed?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by compuguy on Monday July 23, 2018 @03:00PM (#17594970)
It supports ActiveSync, to my knowledge.
[ Parent | on HN ]