News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tattoo Ink Nanoparticles Persist in Lymph Nodes (2017) by bbrian on Saturday July 21, 2018 @09:47PM (#17584841)
Skip to page 54 of this book (PDF) for a light read:

http://cnqzu.com/library/Philosophy/neoreaction/_extra%20aut...

> THE CAUSE OF CRIMINALITY among the white population of England is perfectly obvious to any reasonably observant person, though criminologists have yet to notice it. This cause is the tattooing of the skin.

Re:Tattoo Ink Nanoparticles Persist in Lymph Nodes (2017) by 77pt77 on Saturday July 21, 2018 @11:05PM (#17585087)
> A slow-acting virus, like that of scrapie in sheep, is introduced into the human body via the tattooing needle and makes its way to the brain, where within a few years it causes the afflicted to steal cars, burgle houses, and assault people. I first formulated my viral theory of criminality when I noticed that at least nine of ten white English prisoners are tattooed, more than three or four times the proportion in the general population. The statistical association of crime with tattooing is stronger, I feel certain, than between crime and any other single factor, with the possible exception of smoking.

Thank you for this.

The guy is a British psychiatrist.

Re:Tattoo Ink Nanoparticles Persist in Lymph Nodes (2017) by perl4ever on Saturday July 21, 2018 @11:38PM (#17585165)
A lot of people consider the effects of lead from leaded gas to have been a major factor driving criminality over decades, so it seems odd for someone to not even be aware of that enough to specifically address it.
Re:Tattoo Ink Nanoparticles Persist in Lymph Nodes (2017) by B1FF_PSUVM on Sunday July 22, 2018 @05:56AM (#17586048)
The good doctor was spoofing that.
Re:Tattoo Ink Nanoparticles Persist in Lymph Nodes (2017) by perl4ever on Sunday July 22, 2018 @04:37PM (#17588799)
Is it widely supposed criminal tendencies cause lead ingestion, then?