As far as depicting successful, prominent, men as more likely to attract women, I'd have to say that's pretty analogous with reality. I have a girlfriend, but when my company has local events, my business partner has significantly better luck than he would otherwise. I went boating with, then to a bunch of bars with the Real World DC cast last year, and people were throwing themselves at them, and that's pretty C list. If you don't think women are more likely to perform sex acts with men with money, or who are famous, or both, I think you are either a liar or delusional. Power is sexy.
This is jezebel.com, and thus must be expected. Not that all content on the site is bad, but I usually don't like the site any more than I like male-centric misogynist blogs.
i'm speculating that what they're mad at isn't the fact that there are all-male facilities, but it's how women are treated when they enter said facilities (i.e., like pieces of meat). i think you can fairly call them hypocritical if they attend female-only gyms where every male that enters is only viewed as a sex object
Besides, as pgbovine points out, she didn't say she minded the fact that the clubs are male-only, just the attitudes therein.
She seems kind of bitter. I wonder what her thoughts are on the female-only clubs at Harvard. It has always struck me as highly hypocritical that the same women that scream loudly about any sort of all-male social club have no problem whatsoever with female-only gyms and the like.