NDA would not solve this problem because people would only sign the NDA after they were recruited. (And NDAs cannot compel silence about criminal activity anyway.)
> There's certainly many possible scenarios for people committing some form of election fraud.
Sure, and there are lots of scenarios where a voter ID law doesn't stop them either, like if the criminal masterminds pay a few hundred dollars to have some fake IDs made. Did you think of that scenario?
What there is not is evidence that this happens more than rarely, or is a problem for American elections.
Meanwhile there is tons of evidence that restrictive voting laws prevent legitimate votes from being cast. In short, voter ID laws cause far more vote irregularities than they prevent.
If those people are OK with committing a felony for a few hundred dollars, ok, but I doubt most people would even entertain the idea.
It's a huge risk, a personal risk, and takes a large number of people who all have to be trusted.
And then any NDA they sign will be made irrelevant as soon as one of them gets immunity for testifying against the organizer in what would inevitably become a RICO case.
What if someone (perhaps a political campaign or party) with some kind of vested interest and a whole lot of money broke off a couple hundred dollars for a few hundred people?
Seems like there's money and possibly NDAs involved, in that scenario.
What if someone (perhaps a political party member) with some kind of ends-justify-the-means mentality thinks its for the greater good if they go around voting fraudulently? What if that person convinces a few other like-partied folks that it's for the best and they go along with it?
There's certainly many possible scenarios for people committing some form of election fraud.