Re:Nike Says Its $250 Running Shoes Will Make You Run Much F...
by sopooneo on Friday July 20, 2018 @09:37PM
(#17580270)
One point that surprised me about those banned suits is that the drag reduction they provide is largely indirect. Instead, they're buoyant. They make the swimmers float higher in the water leaving less of them in the pool to be dragged on. So for roughly the same reason you can't compete in the freestyle paddling on a surfboard, you can't use those suits.
Apparently they worked by other mechanisms as well, but the floaty aspect alone seems a reasonable justification for the ban.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-ban-full-body-olympics-swi...
Re:Nike Says Its $250 Running Shoes Will Make You Run Much F...
by zhte415 on Saturday July 21, 2018 @01:54AM
(#17580886)
Your comment reminded me of the 80s movie Running Man. There are no rules, there is only winning.
Which is the antithesis to principles of competing fairly. And in Running Man there were undiscovered rules, but only ones to game the sport which came crashing down resulting in a loss of trust of the institution.
Transparency is key for trust in sport and thus continuality of the larger body.
Re:Nike Says Its $250 Running Shoes Will Make You Run Much F...
by specialist on Saturday July 21, 2018 @05:12AM
(#17581359)
I thought the only rule was to boost ratings.
One of the weirdest arbitrary decisions is the difference between almost universally banned "blood doping" and almost universally allowed "platelet-rich plasma therapy". You can draw a patient's blood and put it in a centrifuge to separate out the red blood cells from the platelets. Reinjecting the red blood cells is doping while reinjecting the platelets is an acceptable medical treatment.