Re:1500 Archers on a 28.8: Network Programming in Age of Emp...
by hughes on Thursday July 19, 2018 @04:09PM
(#17569815)
Why even keep the unsynchronized RNG? I'm guessing it was more performant when used appropriately?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:1500 Archers on a 28.8: Network Programming in Age of Emp...
by kirkules on Thursday July 19, 2018 @04:49PM
(#17570141)
If you don't have an unsynchronized RNG, then any unsynchronized content can't use an RNG, and unsynchronized content is important for improving a game's experience by using local resources for things that don't really need to be shared or sent over a network.
For example, maybe in a FPS, part of the non-gameplay-critical graphics use particle generators for a cool effect that not all players see (because it's behind a building for some of them and thus doesn't even need to be rendered); if these generators used a synchronized RNG, then all players would have to do computations for every particle effect happening anywhere, just so that the combat and more game-important RNG values would be in synch when they really need to be.
Re:1500 Archers on a 28.8: Network Programming in Age of Emp...
by MarkTerrano on Thursday July 19, 2018 @04:42PM
(#17570072)
There were a lot of extra checks and code involved in the synchronized RNG - the results were loggable (to track down sync failures) for instance so bloating that up with every random fire flicker from a burning castle would have been crazy.