News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr... by MBCook on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @11:17AM (#17559195)
You can be open. You just can’t use contracts to extend your monopoly to other areas.

This is not an open/closed dichotomy. This is a free/controlled market issue.

Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr... by VikingCoder on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @11:20AM (#17559224)
I literally don't understand.

If Google manufactured all Android phones, and Android were closed source, and Android came pre-installed with the Play Store, Search, and Chrome, I think it wouldn't be a problem, right?

That turns this into an open/closed dichotomy.

Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr... by MBCook on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @01:27PM (#17560302)
Again, they can be ‘open’ (sell/give to other OEMs), they just can’t use contracts to force those OEMs to help them dominate other markets/kill Android competition.

That’s what they’re doing here, just like MS did in the 90s with Windows licenses.

Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr... by wetpaws on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @12:06PM (#17559600)
If Android was close there would not be any monopoly, I think this is the idea.
Re:European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitr... by VikingCoder on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @12:25PM (#17559748)
That idea is completely false.

It's plausible that Android would have nearly as many users.

Google, for instance, could have all of the current manufacturers agree to OEM their Android devices. Possibly with co-branding.