Re:Zoox and Its $800M Robo Taxi Dream [video]
by argonaut on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @01:51AM
(#17555810)
Only having a month of testing (or otherwise only having barely tested things) is a glaring negative, not a positive like you're framing it as.
The self-reported California metrics themselves cannot be relied upon since the companies (Cruise and Waymo included), could be making it up (and indeed have an incentive to inflate their numbers).
Re:Zoox and Its $800M Robo Taxi Dream [video]
by sempuki on Wednesday July 18, 2018 @03:33PM
(#17561414)
In order to accrue miles you need cars and drivers, which is capital intensive. One car can only drive so far. To get Waymo and Cruise numbers you need Waymo and Cruise money, which Zoox is starting to have. You can expect to see those numbers improve.
At the end of the day though, not all miles are equal. If one were so inclined you could just drive up an down a big highway with autonomy engaged only once merged. Obviously 100 miles of SF traffic is not the same as 100 miles of staying in your lane on cruise control.
It's not bad being in 3rd place against Google and Cruise/GM in a few years.
This type of thing can improve rapidly as they start doing real-world testing... which you cite yourself has merely begun (on real roads mind you, not testing in closed environments). 2200 miles is hardly anything to measure against. Which sounds like months of testing vs Waymo's years.
Not to mention they are developing full new vehicles as well, not just the driving AI software. Which might be highly valuable to a major car company who could acquire them at a significant multiple.
This type of pessimism based on a single metric is toxic and naive regarding how tech companies are built.
...Not to mention there was no claim in this article that they were at Waymo's level or anything but at a very early stage of development.
[1] https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/zoox#section-locked-...