Re:Image optimization decreased website's page weight by 62%
by Jach on Monday July 16, 2018 @04:38PM
(#17544871)
"Install our app!"
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Image optimization decreased website's page weight by 62%
by jakecopp on Monday July 16, 2018 @04:57PM
(#17545048)
Try dailytelegraph.com.au for a good shock!
On mobile, but last I checked was around 700 HTTP requests on a desktop without adblock.
Re:Image optimization decreased website's page weight by 62%
by adventured on Monday July 16, 2018 @06:25PM
(#17545700)
Checked it on Pingdom, from Melbourne, it failed after one minute of trying to load, with 585 requests and 3.4mb.
I always find it difficult to imagine what kind of process leads to that result. The developers can't be happy about it, surely. It has to be a case where management and everyone else throws things they want into the project, a big concensus party, and you end up with a bloated monster at the end.
Re:Image optimization decreased website's page weight by 62%
by jpgrace on Tuesday July 17, 2018 @08:28AM
(#17549180)
In my experience this often means that management is not measuring the right things or that the engineering team is super junior and not empowered to influence strategy.
Re:Image optimization decreased website's page weight by 62%
by RugnirViking on Tuesday July 17, 2018 @05:31AM
(#17548429)
That's truly incredible. It took several long seconds on a usually very quick internet connection. At least they made the page reflow nicely as it loads but it's still ridiculous