News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by fibers on Sunday July 15, 2018 @07:13PM (#17537627)
But no one stops you from getting a domain and effectively creating infinite email addresses to register
Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by jjeaff on Sunday July 15, 2018 @11:51PM (#17538630)
Do you still lock your doors at home, even though a thief could simply throw a rock through your window?
Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by Fnoord on Monday July 16, 2018 @05:08AM (#17539779)
You effectively have unlimited (not infinite) e-mail addresses with Gmail and many other e-mail providers by using the + sign. E.g. [email protected]
Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by fibers on Monday July 16, 2018 @08:30AM (#17540737)
I am well aware of that feature gmail has and have abused it in the past with many websites, but the parent said that some SaaS platforms block gmail altogether. It seems like a shoddy fix if you can get a really cheap domain and essentially do the same to register accounts.
Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by Fnoord on Monday July 16, 2018 @09:07AM (#17540968)
Yeah, its like putting extra locks on the front door while the back door is wide open. However, most people would try the front door first.

A lot of domains have that feature btw. Gmail's specific feature is with the dots functioning as catch-all [1] (though Facebook apparently has the very same feature).

[1] http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/08/01/dots_in_g...

Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by chii on Monday July 16, 2018 @06:15AM (#17540066)
Except sites that mistakenly disallowed the + symbol.

Also, it's very easy to mechanically identify all such users because of the + symbol, which, if you are trying to prevent your real email address from revealed means it's not that useful...

Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by blacksmith_tb on Monday July 16, 2018 @12:58PM (#17542828)
Presumably they don't block [.] however, and since gmail ignores it, you can always just use t.estexample@gmail, then te.stexample@gmail, etc.
Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by Fnoord on Monday July 16, 2018 @07:24AM (#17540386)
Regarding the former, my ISP allows me to set forwarding email address. I could temporarily use these until X date or until they receive (a lot of) spam. Though all spam gets filtered anyway.

Regarding the latter, when they email you directly without the + you can be very strict. You could even apply whitelisting.

Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by nirvdrum on Sunday July 15, 2018 @09:34PM (#17538147)
Virtually no one does this. If their own laziness is enough of a hurdle for them to not bother, I'm fine with that.
Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by F_r_k on Monday July 16, 2018 @02:12AM (#17539116)
Actually I do. I bought a domain of my shortened initials and this domain catches all the emails sent to it. Every entity gets a custom address: [email protected], ikea@..., Etc.

It's very useful

Re:Mailinator.com: Anatomy of a Spammy Campaign by nirvdrum on Monday July 16, 2018 @08:44AM (#17540838)
I use Fastmail's subdomain addressing [1] to sign up for services in a very similar manner. I'm certainly sympathetic to bad services abusing the privilege of having your email address. My contention is that while this is the purported benefit of mailinator.com, in reality many people use it to abuse services.

In other words, there's a big difference between using ikea@ and saastrial1@, saastrial2@, saastrial3@,.. and so on to keep signing up for trials with the same SaaS provider.

[1] -- https://www.fastmail.com/help/receive/addressing.html