Re:Glycemia, starch, and sugar in context (2009)
by ucaetano on Sunday July 15, 2018 @01:56PM
(#17536233)
> if interpreted
But that's the point. He doesn't claim that, he makes a vague claim with ambiguous terms that could be interpreted in any way, even if he's qualified enough to know the precise terms.
That's the health equivalent of post-modern literature.
But that's the point. He doesn't claim that, he makes a vague claim with ambiguous terms that could be interpreted in any way, even if he's qualified enough to know the precise terms.
That's the health equivalent of post-modern literature.