Re:Playing to Lose (2014)
by benjaminl on Saturday July 14, 2018 @10:12PM
(#17533457)
> But what if we relax the second requirement to only apply to intentional resignations, forfeitures, and fouls? What if we had a game where both sides were trying their absolute hardest to make the other side win?
The article address that. You still have to follow the rules of the game.
Re:Playing to Lose (2014)
by vinchuco on Sunday July 15, 2018 @08:57AM
(#17535047)
No, you see, the article author is playing a supergame which is won by finding a play-to-lose version of a game. The parent commenter is simply playing the play-to-lose version of that supergame.
The article address that. You still have to follow the rules of the game.