News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:‘Downloadable Gun’ Clears a Legal Obstacle, and Activists... by Consultant32452 on Saturday July 14, 2018 @09:13PM (#17533294)
The gun show loophole has nothing to do with gun shows and everything to do with private sales. The vast majority of gun sales at gun shows are from licensed arms dealers and they are required to do a background check.

Requiring background checks for private gun sales sounds like a good idea until you do the research on the effort vs benefit. The effort to enforce this would be massive and virtually no gun crimes are committed with these guns anyways. In practical terms you'd have to track every firearm and figure out what to do when Grandpa does and leaves his gun to his children. A parent would have to run a background check on their own child of they buy a gun for them as a gift. Realistically, the only time it could be determined that a gun was sold in private without a background check is if the gun is eventually used in a crime and recovered. The vast, vast majority of guns that wind up in the hands of criminals are through corrupt licensed dealers and straw purchases.

If the purpose of gun control laws is to prevent violent crime, then there's no loophole here since this is not a significant source of weapons used in violent crimes.

Re:‘Downloadable Gun’ Clears a Legal Obstacle, and Activists... by maxerickson on Saturday July 14, 2018 @09:17PM (#17533316)
Requiring parents to do background checks on their children would create liability for a parent that gave a gun to a child that shouldn't have one.

Your argument that it is silly hinges on the idea that parents wouldn't ever do that. But they would.

Those background checks in total would have little impact, but it's not a good argument against requiring background checks.

Re:‘Downloadable Gun’ Clears a Legal Obstacle, and Activists... by Consultant32452 on Saturday July 14, 2018 @09:31PM (#17533355)
Can you provide any evidence that suggests these private sales are a significant source of weapons used in violent crimes? If they're not a significant source of guns used in violent crime, how would you justify such a law?